Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Burden of proof

11 May 2006 / Barry Williams
Issue: 4057 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
BARRY WILLIAMS adds his comments to a recent query concerning missing documents and the burden of proof.

MISSING DOCUMENTS WERE the recent subject of a Readers' forum query (see 'Burden of proof Query T16 786 Taxation 6 April 2006 page 23). The cases concerned documents apparently sent to HMRC but which were not received. In both cases the taxpayer could not prove that the documents were sent but neither could the HMRC Officer prove that they were not. In the first case a P35 was sent by the client without a covering letter; in the second case an election was submitted with other documents but the covering letter did not specifically refer to the election.
The querist refers to the burden of proof and therefore it can be assumed that this has arisen on an appeal as the burden of proof only arises when a matter is subject to appeal. I tend to refer to the 'onus of proof' and...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon