Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Tax cases

24 March 2005
Issue: 4000 / Categories: Tax cases , IR35
Netherlane Ltd (SpC 457).; Sharkey (SpC 459); Thompson (SpC 458); Mundial Invest SA v Moore, Chancery Division, 23 February 2005; Fleming (trading as Bodycraft) v CCE, Chancery Division, 25 February 2005; Peterson v Commissioner of Inland Revenue, Privy Council, 28 February 2005

IR35 applies

A freelance information technology consultant set up the appellant company. The company entered into continuous six-month contracts with a recruitment agency to undertake work for an insurance company (the lower level contracts). The consultant had led a team supporting and maintaining the insurance company's mainframe computer. Over the same period the recruitment company entered into six-month contracts with the same insurance company (the upper level contracts). The lower level contracts expressly incorporated the terms of the upper level contracts.
The Revenue ruled that the IR35 legislation applied. The appellant company appealed.
The Special Commissioner said that in establishing the terms of a hypothetical contract between the consultant and the insurance company for the purposes of IR35 the following factors indicated an employment relationship:

  • the consultant was in charge of a team in that he had management responsibility for the team and was...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon