Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Poles Apart

06 October 2004 / Jason Piper , David Smith
Issue: 3978 / Categories: Arctic Systems , IR35 , Jones v. Garnett , Income Tax
JASON PIPER LLB, LLM, CTA and DAVID SMITH LLB, FTII of Accountax Consulting Ltd analyse the Special Commissioners' judgment in Jones v Garnett.

Settlements

 

ARCTIC SYSTEMS LIMITED is an information technology company whose directors and founder shareholders are Geoff Jones and his wife Diana. The Inland Revenue claimed that the TA 1988 s 660A settlement provisions applied to Diana's dividends because Geoff was the only fee earner.

 

On the first day of the hearing before the Special Commissioners the Inland Revenue dropped its claims to income tax in respect of 'discovery' assessments for earlier years which related to the greater proportion of the disputed liabilities. This was because of the particular and special circumstances of the case and should not be seen as indicative of future Revenue policy in this regard.

 

The case has been widely reported in both the tax and national press and was heard by the Special Commissioners Dr Nuala Brice and Miss Judith Powell in...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon