Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

In person, post or email

30 August 2016
Issue: 4565 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT

TelNG Ltd v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 12 August 2016

Wording in a notice requiring information

HMRC had notified the taxpayer in a letter that it should produce particular papers by post or by email by a specified date under FA 2008 Sch 36 para 1. After some delays on the part of the taxpayer HMRC collected the documents from the taxpayer after the deadline. As a result HMRC imposed a penalty.

The taxpayer said the notice was invalid and the penalty could therefore not stand. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal and the matter progressed to the Upper Tribunal. The taxpayer said because the notice required ‘production of documents’ rather than the ‘provision of information’ they should be ‘produced at a place’. But it did not specify this.

The Upper Tribunal said there was ‘some merit’ in the taxpayer’s argument. But this was to take a literal approach when the legislation had to...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon