Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Co-operate and negotiate

18 August 2005 / Zafar Rezvi
Issue: 4021 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Income Tax

ZAFAR REZVI considers the impact of compliance with the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 on tax investigations.


ZAFAR REZVI considers the impact of compliance with the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 on tax investigations.


CLAIMS BY HM Revenue and Customs for tax-geared penalties constitute a criminal offence or charge for the purposes of Article 6 of the European Convention on Human Rights (ECHR). By contrast HMRC do not accept that fixed penalties for relatively modest amounts constitute an Article 6 criminal charge (see Sharkey v De Croos (26/01/2005) (SPC000459) [2005] STC (SCD) 336). A criminal charge for the purposes of Article 6 has an autonomous meaning — see Han & Yau v CCE [2001] STC 118 and King v Walden (HMIT) [2001] STC 822. So what is the effect if any of a failure by those investigating a claim for penalties to issue a caution or otherwise comply with the codes issued under the Police and Criminal Evidence Act 1984 (respectively the...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon