Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Elephant in the room

18 February 2014 / Iain Macleod
Issue: 4440 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Avoidance

There are better ways to tackle avoidance than those recently proposed by HMRC

KEY POINTS

  • New consultation on proposed powers for HMRC to deal with delays in settlement.
  • Follower notices to enforce payment where there is a court case on a similar point.
  • Tax to be paid up front in avoidance cases.
  • Tax to be demanded in historic cases.
  • Are HMRC themselves often the reason for delay?
  • The effective use of powers would dispel the need for such legislation.

The more thoughtful of HMRC’s officers must have been embarrassed by the contents of the consultation document (condoc) Tackling Marketed Tax Avoidance published on 24 January 2014.

This says that despite the vast array of information their investigative powers and colossal resources HMRC are unable to bring many disputes to a conclusion. But is...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon