Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

A misunderstanding

23 March 2012
Issue: 4347 / Categories: Tax cases , Admin
S Stuart-Turner (TC1539)

The taxpayer made a set-payment arrangement under TMA 1970 s 108 which he believed related to all tax due from the period in which he traded: 2 February 2009 to 16 October 2009.

The arrangement began in April 2010 at a rate of £60 a month. He did not realise his trading period straddled two tax years and that the arrangement covered only the year to 5 April 2009.

As a result he did not pay the tax due for 2009/10 on 31 January 2011 and so incurred a 5% late payment surcharge.

He appealed claiming it was ‘unfair and unreasonable’ for HMRC to impose a penalty in light of the factual background.

The First-tier Tribunal accepted the taxpayer’s arguments and noted the taxpayer had kept up with the payments due under the arrangement made in April...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon