Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Issue : Vol 180, Issue 4621

Issue : Vol 180, Issue 4621

24 Oct 2017

View other Issues

IN THIS ISSUE

Go to page of 2

The ATT highlights a discrepancy in the exemption.

P Degorce v CRC, Court of Appeal, 6 October 2017

R (Newcastle United Football Club and others) v CRC and the Crown Court at Leeds, Queen’s Bench Division, 4 October 2017 ...

R Akester v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 16 October 2017 ...

Sky Throne Ltd (TC6073)

Birley Estate Ltd (TC6134)

Big Bad Wolff (TC6143)

Put your client admin into motion.

Show

15

Results

back pagination icon

Go to page of 2

Newsletter sign-up Subscribe

READERS' FORUM premium icon

Readers’ forum: Impact of voluntary restitution on taxpayers Practice tip: January struggles Readers’ forum: Should we add student loan repayments in disclosure? Readers’ forum: Claiming capital allowances on equipment upgrade Readers’ forum: Is there VAT on furniture insurance?

FIVE WAYS TO MAKE ACCOUNTS PRODUCTION AND TAX EASIER.
Download the exclusive Xero
free report here.

New queries

Please email any questions you might have
to: taxation@lexisnexis.co.uk.

NEWS

High level of claim refusal may deter claimants Employers seeking ways to mitigate NI increase Registration: teething problems for private schools Non-doms not deterred by 2017 deemed domicile reforms In brief: 21 November 2024

Third slide

Deadline dates for December 2024

CASES

Office servicing business is not a trade Retrospective application of apportioning a mixed supply No infringement of human rights Failure to seek time-to-pay arrangement Overturned warrant does not guarantee return of documents

MOST POPULAR

Readers’ forum: Impact of voluntary restitution on taxpayers This week's opinion: 21 November 2024 Office servicing business is not a trade Retrospective application of apportioning a mixed supply No infringement of human rights

back to top icon