Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 4333

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 4333

1 Dec 2011

View other Issues

IN THIS ISSUE

Go to page of 2

Exempt bodies to more easily share back-office services

Employers will not gain excessive tax relief through pension schemes

Candlestick Company (TC1573)

CRC v Rank Group plc (C-259/10 and C-260/10), European Court of Justice

CRC v Cozens and others, Chancery Division

Cardiff Lift Company (TC1470)

Grattan plc v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Innocent Ltd (No 2) (TC1450)

Show

15

Results

back pagination icon

Go to page of 2

Newsletter sign-up Subscribe

READERS' FORUM premium icon

Readers’ forum: Impact of voluntary restitution on taxpayers Practice tip: January struggles Readers’ forum: Should we add student loan repayments in disclosure? Readers’ forum: Claiming capital allowances on equipment upgrade Readers’ forum: Is there VAT on furniture insurance?

FIVE WAYS TO MAKE ACCOUNTS PRODUCTION AND TAX EASIER.
Download the exclusive Xero
free report here.

New queries

Please email any questions you might have
to: taxation@lexisnexis.co.uk.

NEWS

High level of claim refusal may deter claimants Employers seeking ways to mitigate NI increase Registration: teething problems for private schools Non-doms not deterred by 2017 deemed domicile reforms In brief: 21 November 2024

Third slide

Deadline dates for December 2024

CASES

Office servicing business is not a trade Retrospective application of apportioning a mixed supply No infringement of human rights Failure to seek time-to-pay arrangement Overturned warrant does not guarantee return of documents

MOST POPULAR

Readers’ forum: Impact of voluntary restitution on taxpayers This week's opinion: 21 November 2024 Office servicing business is not a trade Retrospective application of apportioning a mixed supply No infringement of human rights

back to top icon