Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 4327

Issue: Vol 168, Issue 4327

24 Oct 2011

View other Issues

IN THIS ISSUE

Go to page of 2

Withdrawal of guidelines means for shareholders

1.2m taxpayers owe HMRC for 2010/11

HMRC boss writes of 'strong regime for ensuring confidentiality of information'

Law experts warn tax exiles of pursuit by HMRC

R (on the application of Davies and another) v CRC; R (on the application of Gaines-Cooper) v CRC, Supreme Court

MEM Industrial Roofing Ltd (TC1447)

Howard Schofield v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

Manchester Electricals Ltd (TC1418)

CRC v Rochdale Drinks Distributors Ltd, Court of Appeal

By Keith Gordon; £48.50

Show

15

Results

back pagination icon

Go to page of 2

READERS' FORUM premium icon

Readers’ forum: New property project: should a separate company be used? Readers’ forum: Is there a disposal or distribution? Readers’ forum: Family forgiveness Readers’ forum: Can interest be paid for previous years? New queries: 5 February 2026

TAX JUST GOT COMPLICATED. HERE’S HOW TO MAKE IT SIMPLE.
Download the exclusive Xero
free report here.

New queries

Please email any questions you might have
to: taxation@lexisnexis.co.uk.

NEWS

Association launches top ten asks to improve tax system Proper consultation would save confusion and upset Low Incomes Tax Reform Group launches new MTD hub HMRC issues 369 fines for AML failures Tax tip: OECD guidelines on remote working and permanent establishments

Third slide

Deadline dates for March 2026

CASES

Supply of care or medical services was not exempt Inaccuracy penalties cancelled Overpayment was not the result of an error in a claim Winding-up order for avoidance scheme promoter Supplement applies because timescale not met

MOST POPULAR

Association launches top ten asks to improve tax system This week's opinion: 5 February 2026 Proper consultation would save confusion and upset Low Incomes Tax Reform Group launches new MTD hub HMRC issues 369 fines for AML failures

back to top icon