Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration
Home Saved articles Viewed items Login Contact Free Trial Advertise View virtual issue View online issue
View online issue
Issue: Vol 165, Issue 4251

Issue: Vol 165, Issue 4251

15 Apr 2010
IN THIS ISSUE
ISA Bulletin premium icon
Revenue questions 'kick-out' clause
19 April 2010
4,600 pay £30K remittance basis charge
Minister announces non-dom figures for 2008/09
14 April 2010
HMRC call-handling shows improvement
16.4m went unanswered over ten months
14 April 2010
Failed to file premium icon
Hansard, 30 Mar 2010, vol 508, no 66, col 1047W
9 April 2010
Lack of clarity and ambiguity premium icon
Adrian Waddington (TC425)
19 April 2010
Disputed value premium icon
Linda Frances Chadwick and another (Hobart’s executors) v CRC, Lands Chamber
16 April 2010
Lost property premium icon
In the matter of the Criminal Justice Act 1988, Revenue and Customs Prosecutions Office v Pigott, Court of Appeal
15 April 2010
No breach of Article 43 premium icon
Test Claimants in the ACT Group Litigation (Class 4) and another v CRC, Chancery Division
15 April 2010
Tax Havens: How Globalisation Really Works premium icon
By Ronen Palan, Richard Murphy and Christian Chavagneux; £15.50
6 April 2010
Show
15
Results
Subscribe
READERS' FORUM premium icon
Read All
Readers’ forum: New property project: should a separate company be used? Readers’ forum: Is there a disposal or distribution? Readers’ forum: Family forgiveness Readers’ forum: Can interest be paid for previous years? New queries: 5 February 2026
TAX JUST GOT COMPLICATED. HERE’S HOW TO MAKE IT SIMPLE.
Download the exclusive Xero
free report here.

New queries
Please email any questions you might have
to: taxation@lexisnexis.co.uk.

NEWS premium icon
Read All
Association launches top ten asks to improve tax system Proper consultation would save confusion and upset Low Incomes Tax Reform Group launches new MTD hub HMRC issues 369 fines for AML failures Tax tip: OECD guidelines on remote working and permanent establishments
DEADLINE DATES
CASES premium icon
Read All
Supply of care or medical services was not exempt Inaccuracy penalties cancelled Overpayment was not the result of an error in a claim Winding-up order for avoidance scheme promoter Supplement applies because timescale not met
MOST POPULAR
Association launches top ten asks to improve tax system This week's opinion: 5 February 2026 Proper consultation would save confusion and upset Low Incomes Tax Reform Group launches new MTD hub HMRC issues 369 fines for AML failures
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back to top icon