taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Richard Curtis

Richard Curtis was deputy editor and editor of Taxation from 2002 until 2021. He can be contacted by email at richard.curtis@gmx.com or phone: 07818 521 296.

ARTICLES

RICHARD CURTIS wonders whether the flat taxes wind from the east threatens our progressive tax régime.


RICHARD CURTIS visits the webpage at the end of the universe.
ICAEW response to Lord Carter's review of HMRC online services; Royal Dutch Shell update
RICHARD CURTIS considers the campaign for a Taxpayer's Bill of Rights or a Taxpayer's Charter

Agony uncle RICHARD CURTIS wonders if men and women and same-sex couples can ever have a meaningful fiscal relationship without tax rearing its ugly head.


THE TAXPAYER IN the recent case of PM v UK ([2005] All ER (D) 255 (Jul)), is described as having 'lived in a stable relationship with Miss D' between 1987 and 1997. They were not married and in June 1991,

RICHARD CURTIS reviews a recent Commons' committee report.
Netlogic Consulting Ltd; Kawthar Consulting Ltd SpC 477; Vodafone 2 SpC 479; PM v UK

RICHARD CURTIS reviews the decision in B E Studios Ltd v Smith & Williamson Ltd.

B E STUDIOS LTD (BES) was incorporated in June 1999 to specialise in the design, production and sale of software for computer games and other commercial uses. After starting on a relatively small scale it started to recruit staff and this process was complete by June 2000. In October 2000, the company retained chartered accountants, Smith & Williamson Ltd, (S & W) to provide tax, financial planning and accountancy advice.

RICHARD CURTIS drills into the tax implications of the Shell and Royal Dutch Petroleum merger.

RICHARD CURTIS provides a brief introduction to the recently introduced Income Tax (Trading and Other Income) Act 2005.

RICHARD CURTIS refuses to go quietly when considering tax and criminal activities.

AL CAPONE SUPPOSEDLY said: 'The income tax law is a lot of bunk. The government can't collect legal taxes from illegal money'. This came to mind on seeing the ' Loose End ' from Peter Vaines ('Crime pays...', Taxation , 24 February 2005, p503) — reporting that a bank robber in Holland had been allowed to deduct the cost of the gun from the restitution that he had to make — and made me wonder what were the tax implications of such activities in the UK.

RICHARD CURTIS reviews the Special Commissioner's decision and admonishment in Todd v Fawcett.
Show
12
Results
back to top icon