Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Tribunal has jurisdiction to rule on legitimate expectation

24 August 2021
Issue: 4806 / Categories: Tax cases

KSM Henryk Zeman Sp Z.o.o v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 4 August 2021


The taxpayer established in Poland entered into a contract to install a boiler in the UK with another Polish company who was not VAT registered in the UK. The taxpayer registered for VAT in the UK and HMRC issued an assessment for underdeclared VAT.

The taxpayer appealed saying it had legitimate expectation that it would not be assessed to VAT on particular supplies. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the appeal on the ground the taxpayer had not acted reasonably in relying on HMRC’s statements.

The taxpayer appealed to the Upper Tribunal. It said the lower tribunal had erred in its conclusion and also that it did not have the jurisdiction to consider the public law issue of legitimate expectation in an appeal against a VAT assessment.

The Upper Tribunal decided the taxpayer did not have a legitimate expectation because its supplies were not limited to those mentioned...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon