Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Quay wall functioned as plant, not premises

20 January 2025
Issue: 4969 / Categories: Tax cases
The Mersey Docks and Harbour Company Ltd (TC9391)

The taxpayer was the operator of the Port of Liverpool. Between 2013 and 2017 it developed Liverpool2 a new deep-water container terminal at the port. This involved building a quay wall next to the river and a container transition area (CTA) of reclaimed land. It claimed capital allowances on the cost of building the wall.

HMRC said the wall was not plant or machinery and therefore did not qualify for capital allowances. If it was plant or machinery the expenditure was excluded by CAA 2001 s 22 list B item 5 (dock harbour wharf pier marina or jetty) and not saved by s 23 list C.

The taxpayer appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal found that the primary purposes of the wall were to provide mooring for ships and to provide support for the ship-to-shore cranes. Both were key functions and essential to...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon