Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Plant expenditure in hydroelectric scheme

02 December 2019
Issue: 4723 / Categories: Tax cases
CRC v SSE Generation Ltd, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 4 November 2019
 

SSE built a hydroelectric scheme in Scotland at a cost of £300m including rectification works. The company claimed capital allowances amounting to £260m on items of plant under CAA 2001 s 11. HMRC accepted only £34m and refused the rest on the basis they were disqualified under s 21 and s 22. The First-tier Tribunal allowed the taxpayer’s appeal. HMRC appealed against the findings in respect of the most substantial items. 

The Upper Tribunal said the case turned on statutory interpretation and the interpretation of several words used in CAA 2001: tunnel aqueduct installation and pipeline. The judges agreed with the First-tier Tribunal that these should be given their ordinary English meanings.

The judges said the function of list B in s 22 was to ‘draw the line in the sand’ between expenditure on assets that have the character of real estate or buildings or structures ...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon