Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Penalties for a deliberate inaccuracy

26 August 2022
Issue: 4855 / Categories: Tax cases

Booth Ltd v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 9 August 2022


HMRC said that the taxpayer knew or should have known that some of its transactions were connected to the fraudulent evasion of VAT. It raised assessments for output tax after refusing the company's zero-rating claim. For the same reason it denied the taxpayer’s input VAT claim.

After the First-tier Tribunal dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal (against which it did not appeal) HMRC imposed a penalty on the ground the taxpayer’s VAT return contained deliberate inaccuracies and had claimed input tax credits which it knew to be wrong.

The taxpayer appealed. The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the appeal but the taxpayer was given permission to appeal to the Upper Tribunal.

On the taxpayer’s argument that HMRC had to prove dishonesty before imposing penalties for a deliberate inaccuracy the Upper Tribunal said this was not the case. It referred to Auxilium (TC5024) in which the First-tier Tribunal said a deliberate inaccuracy occurred...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon