Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

No remittances arose from indemnity transactions

21 September 2022
Issue: 4858 / Categories: Tax cases
R Sehgal and another (TC8581)

The taxpayers were UK-resident non-domiciled individuals who claimed the remittance basis. They sold their shares in a company (VGL) to a Luxembourg resident company (CLS). At the time of the sale another company (IRL) indirectly owned by the taxpayers through a Jersey company (SKS) owed VGL’s subsidiary about £6m. Under the share purchase agreement the taxpayers provided an indemnity for the debt.

Soon after the sale it became clear that the debt could not be recovered. This triggered the indemnity. However because CLS’s parent company was concerned about the effect of the indemnity payment it asked the taxpayers to discharge the debt in a less straightforward way. This entailed SKS buying clothing goods from another company (M) in CLS’s group with CLS and the taxpayers entering into a side letter in which they agreed that the payment for the clothing would reduce the debt...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon