Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Invalid reasons for decision not to exercise discretion

27 August 2024
Issue: 4951 / Categories: Tax cases
The King (on the application of) USB AG v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 21 August 2024

UBS obtained permission to bring a judicial review in relation to HMRC’s decision not to exercise its discretion under ITEPA 2003 s 684(7A)(b) to relieve UBS of its obligation – as employer - to deduct PAYE from payments made to a former employee. Broadly the employee’s remuneration involved gilt option agreements intended to reflect his team’s performance. These constituted ‘notional payments’ under Income Tax (PAYE) Regulations 2003 reg 62 which obliged UBS to deduct tax from them. However in this case the taxpayer had left the employer some time before the options were exercised as a result of which UBS was obliged to ‘account [to HMRC] for any amount which the employer is unable to deduct’ (reg 62(5)). Under ITEPA 2003 s 684(7A)(b) HMRC has discretion to relieve the employer from this obligation.

HMRC decided not to do this on the grounds...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon