Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

HMRC’s treatment of appeal was reasonable

20 January 2025
Issue: 4969 / Categories: Tax cases
P Sehgal and another (TC9389)

The taxpayers were paid bonuses by their employer. HMRC decided that the tax paid by the employer on these payments should be treated as the taxpayers’ earnings under ITEPA 2003 s 223. It raised assessments on the individuals who appealed. HMRC subsequently agreed that the tax liability fell on their company. The taxpayers applied for costs from HMRC on the basis that it had acted unreasonably in pursuing an appeal which was unmeritorious.

The First-tier Tribunal said that in considering whether HMRC had acted unreasonably it had to focus on the tax authority’s handling of the appeal rather than of the original decision ie the conduct after the taxpayers had filed notices of appeal.

It had been the taxpayers’ decision to instruct tax counsel to settle amended grounds of appeal because their original grounds had not been pleaded properly. It was not because of any...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon