Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Correct approach to quantifying potential lost revenue

22 July 2019
Issue: 4705 / Categories: Tax cases
CRC v J Robertson, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 2 July 2019

In 2012-13 2013-14 and 2014-15 Mrs Robertson received child benefit. Her husband who was the higher earner had income of more than £50 000. Both were taxed under PAYE and were not registered for self assessment. They did not elect to stop receiving the benefit and did not notify chargeability to tax. HMRC decided the high income child benefit charge applied. It issued assessments for the relevant years and also penalties for failure to notify chargeability. 

Mr Robertson appealed against the penalties. The First-tier Tribunal allowed this so HMRC appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

At the hearing HMRC said it accepted the penalties should be charged at 10% of the potential lost revenue rather than 20%. 

The Upper Tribunal said FA 2008 Sch 41 para 7 defined potential lost revenue as: ‘So much of any income tax … to which P is liable in respect of...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon