Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Companies had behaved dishonestly

20 January 2025
Issue: 4969 / Categories: Tax cases
M Karpavicius and M Pakuliene (TC9371)

The taxpayers were directors of two limited companies which failed to submit VAT returns for many periods between May 2016 and May 2019. They accepted estimated assessments issued by HMRC despite them significantly understating the true liability. The companies were later dissolved so penalties for dishonest conduct were transferred to the taxpayers by virtue of personal liability notices (VATA 1994 s 61). The penalties were based on the difference between the estimated assessments and the actual liability. The taxpayers said they always intended to submit returns so had not behaved dishonestly.

Since 2007 penalties for careless and deliberate behaviour have been based on the amounts of output tax underpaid or input tax overclaimed on a return ie by comparing the VAT declared with the ‘true amount of tax’ for each period and then making a judgment about the taxpayer behaviour that caused the underpayment (FA...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon