Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Broad connection between payment and termination

20 February 2024
Issue: 4926 / Categories: Tax cases
S Mathur v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 12 February 2024

The taxpayer’s employer offered her £82 135 in compensation for terminating her employment which she refused. She began employment tribunal proceedings but after mediation she accepted a settlement of £6m from the employer. PAYE was applied to all but £30 000.

The taxpayer appealed saying the payment arose from negotiations based on the discrimination and victimisation she had experienced during her employment with the bank and the wish of the bank to avoid the embarrassment of publicity. HMRC agreed to an element for this but taxed the balance as employment income within ITEPA 2003 s 401.

The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal. She appealed to the Upper Tribunal.

The issue was whether the First-tier Tribunal erred in law when it decided that the £6m payment was received indirectly in consequence of or otherwise in connection with the termination of her employment.

On the taxpayer’s argument...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon