Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Explanation of Queen’s Club VAT decision

12 December 2017 / Robert Maas
Issue: 4628 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
istock-538031140_fmt

Stick to the facts

KEY POINTS

  • Tax cases have a factual element and that is affected by the law.
  • Link between sporting facilities and restaurant refurbishment.
  • Meaning of ‘used for’ is a question of interpretation.
  • No special rules for sports clubs.

The decision of the First-tier Tribunal in favour of Queen’s Club (TC6119) illustrates the unpredictability of tax cases concerning sports clubs commented a recent STEP News Digest. This was because other cases with similar facts such as Bridgnorth Golf Club (TC94) and Bedale Golf Club (TC4619) were decided the other way. Neil Warren in ‘Grey areas’ (Taxation 12 October page 14) seemed equally puzzled although he concluded that the Queen’s Club decision was right but largely on the basis of the club’s international reputation.

However it seems to me that both comments miss the point that...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon