Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Old for new

29 March 2016
Issue: 4543 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT

CRC v Vodafone Group ServicesUpper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 19 February 2016

Amending a VAT repayment claim to include later claims relating to different transactions

In January 2007 Vodafone claimed a VAT repayment of £4m. It represented the amount by which it had over-declared its liability for output tax under the Nectar card scheme in its VAT returns for the periods 01/04 to 01/06.

HMRC rejected the claim. Vodafone made further claims unrelated to the Nectar scheme but some were for accounting errors in the same accounting periods.

HMRC accepted the later claims but refused to repay some of them on the ground that they had been made out of time.

Vodafone said it was permissible to amend the Nectar claim which had been made in time to encompass the later ones.

The First-tier Tribunal allowed Vodafone’s appeal on the basis that it was implicit in VATA 1994 s 80 that the reasons for the amount being claimed...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon