Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

No direct link

08 March 2016
Issue: 4541 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT

Norseman Gold plc v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber), 4 February 2016

Claim for deduction of input tax

The taxpayer was a UK parent company of a group that carried out gold mining activities in Australia. The taxpayer was registered for VAT under the classification for management consultancy and claimed input tax on UK expenses. HMRC refused the claim on the basis that the taxpayer had not been carrying on economic activity because it had not been making nor did it have an intention to make supplies for consideration for VAT purposes.

The First-tier Tribunal dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal.

The Upper Tribunal said the main issue was whether the supplies made by the taxpayer to its subsidiaries had been for consideration within the meaning of art 2(1) of the Principal VAT Directive and VATA 1994 s 5(2).

Mr Justice Warren said the supplies had not been made for consideration; they had been made gratuitously. The taxpayer had agreed that...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon