Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

GAAR penalties may backfire

16 February 2016
Issue: 4538 / Categories: News
More detail is needed about what the GAAR panel considers abusive before penalties are introduced.

The government’s rush to impose tough penalties in tax avoidance cases may be counterproductive.

The Chartered Institute of Taxation (CIOT) has reaffirmed its opposition to the general anti-abuse rule (GAAR) penalty in its response to draft Finance Bill legislation (tinyurl.com/zly65ek). But it is concerned that penalties are being introduced before the GAAR advisory panel has heard a single case and with taxpayers still unsure of what activities will be subject to counteraction.

The CIOT said there was a big risk that the GAAR penalties will be deemed incompatible with the European Convention on Human Rights if they are disproportionate or do not comply with the principles of legal certainty.

As a result in a finely balanced case a GAAR panel or court might be more lenient towards the taxpayer because of the harsh consequences of the 60% of the tax-at-stake penalty.

John Cullinane CIOT’s tax policy...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon