Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Skydive, skyfall

29 September 2015 / Mike Truman
Issue: 4520 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
truman_18
The decisions in recent enterprise investment scheme appeals have elicited varying degrees of sympathy.
KEY POINTS
  • No claim for EIS relief because income was below the personal allowance.
  • The effect of a reverse takeover on EIS claims.
  • Company must carry on a qualifying trade on a commercial basis.
  • Get to grips with EIS to ensure clients qualify for the correct relief.
 
Sometimes when I look at tribunal cases in which the taxpayer has lost I find it hard to summon up much sympathy. 
 
Why did they do that I ask myself. Or did they seriously think that a judge with years of tax experience was really going to believe they were not thinking mostly (or only) about the tax advantage when they took...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon