Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Extent of premises

12 March 2015
Issue: 4494 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT

Bagel Nash Ltd (TC4279)

The taxpayer company sold bagels from a food court kiosk.

It began its business by accounting for output tax on the sales of takeaway cold items on the basis the food court was part of a larger outlet where customers would eat their purchases.

The firm later decided that zero-rating should apply because the court was not part of its kiosk, where food was not consumed. It submitted a claim for a VAT refund that HMRC refused.

The taxpayer appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal held that no food could be eaten in the kiosk because no customer could enter it – but in a commonsense view, the bagel bar included the food court for the purposes of VATA 1994, sch 8 group 1 note 3(a).

The taxpayer’s appeal was dismissed.

Issue: 4494 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT
back to top icon