Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Same or different?

26 February 2015
Issue: 4491 / Categories: Tax cases

The Queen on the application of ELS Group Ltd v CRC, Upper Tribunal

The taxpayer company supplied lecturers to colleges of further education as principal rather than agent. It claimed exemption from VAT because it was an eligible body making supplies of education within VATA 1994 sch 9 group 6 item 1.

HMRC ruled the business was not an eligible body following the Court of Justice of the European Union’s decision in Kennemer Golf and Country Club (C-174/00) [2002] STC 502.

The taxpayer restructured itself creating a subsidiary as an employment bureau that would take over the provision of supplies of lecturers to colleges although some institutions continued to deal only with the taxpayer.

The Revenue decided the new subsidiary was supplying staff not education and that it could take advantage of VAT – Hire of Self-Employed Staff by Employment Bureaux – Further Guidance an article in Business Brief 10/04 which provided that...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon