Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Inconsistent treatment

26 February 2015
Issue: 4491 / Categories: Tax cases , Avoidance , Capital Gains , Losses

Herefordshire Property Company Ltd (TC4286)

The controlling director of the taxpayer company wanted to sell an investment property. He sought advice on how to mitigate charges after learning that 68% of the gain would be lost taxes.

His tax adviser suggested a capital redemption policy scheme that would create an allowable capital loss which the company could realise and offset against the gain on the property. A similar scheme was marketed by KPMG and Grant Thornton.

The taxpayer went ahead with the scheme and then completed its tax return showing the gain against which the loss was to be offset.

The scheme was later found by the Special Commissioners the High Court and the Court of Appeal to fail. The taxpayer accepted the result withdrew the loss and paid the tax on the gain.

HMRC told the controlling director that he and the other participants in the scheme were to be...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon