Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Partner, not employee

19 January 2015
Issue: 4486 / Categories: Tax cases , Employees , Income Tax

HS Patel (TC4189)

The taxpayer ran a sub-post office within his retail business. The Post Office paid him £76 008 as compensation when the branch closed in June 2004.

HMRC assessed the payment to tax on the basis £30 000 was exempt under ITEPA 2003 s 403 but the balance was taxable.

The taxpayer appealed claiming his wife had been his employee when he was sub-postmaster. He claimed he should be allowed a deduction in respect of £37 122 he paid her as redundancy. He also claimed the costs of refitting the shop to remove the trappings of the sub-post office.

The First-tier Tribunal found there was no evidence to show the wife had been an employee. She had been a partner in the retail business entitled to 50% of the profits. No deduction could be allowed on the payment to the wife.

Expenses incurred by the taxpayer in...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon