Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Justified discovery

19 September 2014
Issue: 4470 / Categories: Tax cases , Admin , Avoidance , Self assessment

N Pattullo (TC3958)

The taxpayer submitted his 2003/04 tax return and claimed capital losses of about £2.6m.

HMRC examined the return in October 2006 and concluded the taxpayer had taken part in an avoidance scheme involving second-hand insurance policies.

The department issued a notice under TMA 1970 s 20(1) with which the taxpayer did not comply. He sought a judicial review to have the notice set aside.

The Court of Session dismissed the taxpayer’s application in May 2009 around the time the Court of Appeal in J Drummond v CRC [2009] STC 2206 ruled that a similar avoidance scheme did not work.

The situation satisfied Revenue that the taxpayer’s return was incorrect. The taxman raised a £835 400 discovery assessment and the taxpayer appealed.

The taxpayer first argued there had been no discovery under s 29(1). The First-tier Tribunal disagreed saying the critical decision was the Court of...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon