Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

A conventional privilege

21 July 2005 / Jason Collins
Issue: 4017 / Categories: Comment & Analysis
JASON COLLINS considers whether United Kingdom common law or European Union convention rights are best placed to protect confidential client communications.

THE EUROPEAN UNION Third Anti-Money Laundering Directive was published on 1 July 2004 and must be implemented by the EU Member States within two years.

The directive continues the theme of the Second Directive in requiring Member States to ensure that the prescribed exemptions from reporting money-laundering activities are applied uniformly between professionals providing directly comparable services. The directive states that this requirement is necessary 'in order to ensure the respect of the rights laid down in the European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms' ('convention rights').

This article looks at whether those rights also have the effect of extending legal professional privilege (LPP) to non-lawyers providing services directly comparable to those provided by lawyers — particularly tax advisers advising on tax law. It should be noted here that the question as to whether the availability of LPP makes any practical difference to successful tax planning...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon