Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

To Claim Or Not?

10 March 2005 / David O'keeffe , David Bywater
Issue: 3998 / Categories: Comment & Analysis

DAVID O'KEEFFE and DAVID BYWATER consider a number of practical issues impacting on the availability of research and development tax relief.

DAVID O'KEEFFE and DAVID BYWATER consider a number of practical issues impacting on the availability of research and development tax relief.

THE RESEARCH AND development (R&D) tax relief regimes for small and medium sized companies (SMEs) and large companies have been in place for just over four and two years respectively. Over that time a number of issues have come to the fore which may arise when preparing claims and also when agreeing claims with the Inland Revenue. This article looks at four such issues and considers the relevant legislation and non-statutory guidance.

Sub-contracting of research and development

The fundamental difference between the regime for SMEs and that for large companies is highlighted by the treatment of sub-contracted R&D expenditure. As a rule of thumb the SME regime provides an incentive to the company which bears the financial cost of the R&D project whereas the large...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon