Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

No hiding place

07 July 2005 / David Corker , Ellen Zeisler
Issue: 4015 / Categories: Comment & Analysis

DAVID CORKER and ELLEN ZEISLER warn that a minor connection with the US can result in major consequences if a tax mitigation scheme goes wrong.

DAVID CORKER and ELLEN ZEISLER warn that a minor connection with the US can result in major consequences if a tax mitigation scheme goes wrong.

THOSE WHO ADVISE upon and benefit from creative tax mitigation schemes know there is no clear line of demarcation between tax avoidance and mitigation. There is always a risk that a tax collection authority will claim that a scheme amounts to a tax fraud. Some recent developments in the US and the UK serve to accentuate that risk. The subject of this article is to narrate these developments and explain how they increase the risk of criminal problems later on.

United States

Whereas in the UK tax delinquency is regarded primarily as a subject for administrative and regulatory law in the United States it is seen far more as criminal conduct. From Al Capone onwards prosecutions for tax fraud have been regarded...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon