Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Lacking awareness

28 January 2014
Issue: 4437 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT

Fonecomp Ltd v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

The taxpayer company bought mobile phones in two transactions during July 2006 and claimed a refund of input tax.

HMRC refused the claim on the basis the purchases were connected with missing trader intra-community fraud and that the taxpayer knew or should have known about the fraud.

The First-tier Tribunal (FTT) dismissed the taxpayer’s appeal finding that the taxpayer should have known about the fraudulent evasion of VAT and refusing the company’s application that a reference be made to the Court of Justice of the European Union.

The taxpayer appealed to the Upper Tribunal where it argued that the FTT should have found the business was entitled to claim as input tax the VAT paid in relation to the transactions.

The Upper Tribunal said the FTT had identified the legal principles correctly and directed itself properly with regard to the law when deciding the case. It...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon