Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Misinformed

03 October 2013
Issue: 4423 / Categories: Tax cases , Income Tax

H Amah (TC2805)

The taxpayer was a freelance locum optician who ran a Dollond & Aitchison franchise until April 2009. He made a loss in his final year of trading some of which was carried back against the previous year’s profit.

He applied to have the balance of the loss set against his 2010 income.

HMRC refused the claim and the taxpayer’s adviser agreed with the department’s decision that the losses could not be used against the taxpayer’s freelance income because it was different from working as a self-employed franchisor.

The Revenue issued a statutory demand for the tax saying it would sue for bankruptcy if the payment was not made.

The taxpayer applied to lodge a late appeal; the First-tier Tribunal said it was “arguable” the losses should have been allowed.

The judge concluded the taxpayer had “continued in his trade as a self-employed dispensing optician throughout” implying...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon