Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Not seeing eye to eye

19 September 2013
Issue: 4421 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT

Prescription Eyewear Ltd (TC2759)

The taxpayer company was a UK-based retailer of prescription glasses running a website through which customers could order spectacles. A qualified dispensing optician supervised the supply but did not carry out eye tests.

The taxpayer contended it made two supplies in relation to each pair of prescription glasses: an exempt supply of medical services and a taxable supply of goods.

HMRC did not accept the claim of an exempt supply of medical services because there was no face-to-face contact with customers. The department argued that the medical care provided by the taxpayer was ancillary to the supply of prescription glasses and was therefore a single standard-rated supply.

The taxpayer appealed.

The First-tier Tribunal considered the taxpayer’s business in relation to the decision in CCE v Leightons Ltd [1995] STC 458 and concluded that the taxpayer’s dispensing opticians provided all the services set out in Leightons despite there...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon