Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Commercial or artificial?

16 July 2013
Issue: 4411 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT

Newey v CRC, Court of Justice of the EU

The taxpayer was a loan broker in the UK. His services were exempt from VAT meaning he was unable to reclaim the VAT on advertising services supplied to him. He attempted to rectify his position by incorporating a company Alabaster in Jersey.

Broking contracts were made between the company and the lenders resulting in commissions being paid to Alabaster instead of to the taxpayer.

The company did not process the applications but paid fees to the taxpayer for the use of his services. In practice borrowers contacted the taxpayer in the UK who processed the applications and sent them to Jersey for authorisation. No request for authorisation was refused. Advertising services were also supplied to Alabaster.

HMRC said the ad services were in effect being supplied to the taxpayer in the UK and were taxable. The First-tier Tribunal allowed the taxpayer’s appeal and...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon