Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

HMRC acted appropriately

11 December 2012
Issue: 4383 / Categories: Tax cases
AJM Mansell Ltd (TC2279)

The taxpayer company was a pharmacy that derived much of its income from the Department of Health which was consistently late with its payments.

In 2010/11 the business was tardy in making several payments of PAYE and National Insurance; HMRC imposed penalties under FA 2009 Sch 56.

The taxpayer appealed claiming fewer penalties would have applied had the Revenue allocated payments of PAYE differently.

The department said it was the employer that allocated payment to a particular tax month; it was not for the taxman to do so even if penalties would be reduced as a result.

The First-tier Tribunal found PAYE was a debt due to HMRC and the employer was a debtor. Each month’s PAYE was a separate debt: there was “no ‘running’ account”.

Had such an arrangement existed PAYE payments would have automatically been allocated to the oldest debt and...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon