.png)
.png)
Categories:
Comment & Analysis
As the Court of Appeal hears the case of Total People Ltd, JOHN MESSORE reports with the help of PETER MOROZ
KEY POINTS
- Monthly lump sum payments to employees using own cars for business travel
- Are these payments general earnings or “relevant motoring expenditure”?
- An analysis of Social Security (Contributions) Regulations 2001 Reg 22A(3).
- A recap of the decision in the two tribunal hearings.
- A decision is awaited but the Court of Appeal appears sympathetic to the taxpayer.
Had somebody told me a year ago that on 2 October 2012 I would be sitting in the Royal Courts of Justice hearing round 3 of Cheshire Employer and Skills Development Limited (formerly Total People Limited) v HMRC (Court of Appeal Hearing A3/2012 0216) I would never have believed them.
Nor could I have even begun to guess exactly what goes on in those hallowed rooms once the doors are shut....
Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.
Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.
