Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

The association

24 July 2012 / Nichola Ross-martin
Issue: 4363 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Companies
Who is associated with whom, and why? NICHOLA ROSS-MARTIN investigates

KEY POINTS

  • The effect of associated companies on corporation tax liabilities.
  • ESC C9 was legislated into CTA 2010 s 27.
  • The definition of control in CTA 2010 s 450.
  • Applying the minimum controlling combination rules in a practical example.
  • Don’t forget to determine whether there is substantial commercial interdependence.

If ever there was a topic ripe for simplification it is the associated company rules. When one company is associated with another for corporation tax purposes CTA 2010 s 24 tells us to reduce the lower and upper limits for corporation tax accordingly.

This means associated companies may pay higher rates of tax than singleton companies. The reason for this rule is to prevent the splitting of a business between companies in order to avoid the marginal or...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon