Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Is it me?

01 May 2012 / Kevin Slevin
Issue: 4351 / Categories: Comment & Analysis , Admin
How was an HMRC inquiry started and then allowed to continue, wonders KEVIN SLEVIN

KEY POINTS

  • Are HMRC officers getting sufficient training when enquiring into tax returns?
  • Misleading wording on the tax return results in information shown in the wrong area.
  • HMRC suggest that the ‘additional information’ box is not part of the tax return.
  • The two tests in TMA 1970 s 29 are ignored.
  • What would be expected from a reasonable
  • HMRC officer?

This article seeks to capture in print the stance taken by one HMRC officer pursuing tax interest and penalties from an unsuspecting taxpayer and poses the following question: are the standards of HMRC caseworkers falling or am I just becoming even grumpier?

Hopefully none of the views expressed in the communications received from one particular tax office are those of real decision makers within...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon