Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Incomplete decision

17 October 2011
Issue: 4326 / Categories: Tax cases , Income Tax
Huhtala v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

The taxpayer an author and journalist lived in London and owned a boat normally moored on the Thames. He used it when taking photographs and obtaining material for a book about the river.

In early 2006 he decided to do further research but this time in France. The boat was moved to Port Grimaud where it was moored for some time. The taxpayer and his wife lived on the boat while it was there.

He claimed £10 000 against his income as ‘expenditure... for moving mooring and living on the boat in the south of France’.

HMRC disallowed the claim on the basis that under ITTOIA 2005 s 34 the expenditure was not incurred ‘wholly and exclusively for the purposes of the trade’. That is ...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon