Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

David’s demolition

26 July 2011
Issue: 4314 / Categories: Forum & Feedback
'Draft rules did not follow article's reasoning'

I recently read Henry Wood’s article A matter of timing. Of interest to me was the example of David’s demolition and the allocation of the annual investment allowance (AIA) on pre- and post-April 2012 expenditure. The reason why this jumped out at me was because the logic in the apportionment was exactly the same as I understood previously.

However a review of the draft rules did not follow this reasoning. The result is a reduction in the entitlement of a business to AIA in the transition year which is far greater than what most advisers logically expected.

The draft law as it is written and has been debated in parliament restricts the total expenditure that can qualify for AIAs in the post-1 April 2012 period to the amount of the maximum allowance attributable to that period.

So in...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon