Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Fair conclusion

06 April 2011
Issue: 4299 / Categories: Tax cases
Queenspice Ltd v CRC, Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber)

HMRC assessed the taxpayer company for VAT in respect of under-declaration of output tax during the period from March 2002 to May 2008.

The taxpayer appealed to the First-tier Tribunal which decided the assessment had been calculated to HMRC’s ‘best judgment’ on the basis of the information available to them at 30 August 2008.

The taxpayer appealed saying the tribunal had misdirected itself in law by ignoring the evidence of an expert witness who had shown that the information used by HMRC was not a sound basis for extrapolation of the turnover of the restaurant over six years.

The Upper Tribunal (Tax and Chancery Chamber) said that the word ‘best’ where it was used in the phrase ‘to the best of their judgment’ in VATA 1994 s 73(1) implied that the result might...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon