Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Special circumstances

04 April 2011
Issue: 4299 / Categories: Tax cases , VAT
DG and D Lewis t/a Russell Francis Interiors (TC983)

The taxpayers were in the furniture business and had a small portfolio of property. In May 2009 they exchanged contracts on the purchase of a commercial warehouse which required them to pay a deposit of £25 000 plus VAT.

They believed incorrectly that the date of the exchange of contracts was the relevant tax point for VAT purposes and claimed all the VAT on the transaction in the quarter to June 2009.

HMRC amended the return disallowing the claim and imposed a penalty of £5 062 in respect of an error in the taxpayer’s VAT return claiming the mistake was careless (FA 2007 Sch 24).

The department gave the taxpayers the maximum discount available for their prompted disclosure.

The taxpayers appealed on the ground that the penalty was too harsh...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon