Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Bungalow bill

09 November 2010
Issue: 4280 / Categories: Forum & Feedback , VAT
Due to structural faults, an initial plan to extend a property was replaced by a scheme to completely demolish it and construct a new house

A builder client has been working on what was originally planned as a building extension. An existing bungalow was to have a garage added to it. The roof was also to be taken off and the bungalow was to be built upwards to become a house before the roof was put back on: clearly all VAT standard-rated work.

However when the roof was removed the structure of the building was found to be unsound so the decision was taken to demolish the property and rebuild it completely.

The local planning authority gave retrospective permission for the ‘erection of a replacement five-bed dwelling with associated external alterations’.

The owner of the property has been advised that he cannot claim back the VAT charged by labour-only subcontractors and so is insisting that my client issue credit notes to cancel the VAT previously charged even though those invoices were properly...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon