Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Rectification of a mistake

06 August 2010
Issue: 4267 / Categories: Tax cases , Inheritance Tax
Ashcroft v Barnsdale and others, High Court (Chancery Division), [2010] EWHC 1948 (Ch)

The claimant was the husband of the deceased testator with the first defendant (Barnsdale) being the deceased’s brother and the second and third defendants being the children of the deceased and the claimant. The defendants were not present and did not contest the claim.

The deceased’s estate was worth around £1.7m and the claimant and the first defendant were executors of her will.

Under the terms of the will the claimant was to receive £10 000 and farmland while the residue was to be passed to the second and third defendants the children.

The assets that were left to the claimant were meant to pass to him without any inheritance tax liability with the tax burden chargeable to the estate falling upon the children as residuary beneficiaries.

The estate’s accountants suggested drawing up a deed of variation with the claimant treated as the...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon