Taxation logo taxation mission text

Since 1927 the leading authority on tax law, practice and administration

Tax consequences not appreciated

02 July 2010
Issue: 4262 / Categories: Tax cases , Hastings-Bass , Capital Gains , Inheritance Tax
Jiggens and another v Low and another, Chancery Division

The claimants were the two surviving trustees of a settlement made in January 1992.

The defendants were the children of the settlor and the only primary beneficiaries under the settlement although there was also a wider class of potential beneficiaries.

The assets of the settlement included a farm which had significant development value.

It was decided to appoint entitlements of all the trust income equally to the defendants before the first defendant’s 25th birthday so the trustees executed a deed ‘irrevocably’ declaring that the trust income would be paid in equal shares to the defendants.

The trustees were later told the grant of an irrevocable and unlimited appointment of the income to the beneficiaries was tantamount to an absolute appointment of capital which for capital gains tax purposes constituted a deemed disposal of the whole trust fund and could give rise...

If you or your firm subscribes to Taxation.co.uk, please click the login box below:

If you are not a subscriber but are a registered user or have a free trial, please enter your details in the following boxes:

Alternatively, you can register free of charge to read a limited amount of subscriber content per month.
Once you have registered, you will receive an email directing you back to read this item in full.

Please reach out to customer services at +44 (0) 330 161 1234 or 'customer.services@lexisnexis.co.uk' for further assistance.

back to top icon